Margaret Sanger/Planned Parenthood

Liberals who support abortion and a so called “a women’s right to choose” have revered Margaret Sanger like she was Mother Theresa. As with most liberal policies there is always an underlying meaning to what they are attempting to ram down the peoples throats. This women would have made a Chinese Hitler feel like he was to soft on his victims.

These are all statements by the late racist, abortion supporting populationist.

Does this sound racist at all?

“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying… demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism…”

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

“Such parents swell the pathetic ranks of the unemployed. Feeble-mindedness perpetuates itself from the ranks of those who are blandly indifferent to their racial responsibilities. And it is largely this type of humanity we are now drawing upon to populate our world for the generations to come. In this orgy of multiplying and replenishing the earth, this type is pari passu multiplying and perpetuating those direst evils in which we must, if civilization is to survive, extirpate by the very roots.”

“Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.”

How about these Chinese modeled population control efforts?

“We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”

“No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…”

“No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.”

Listen to her feelings about the poor and wanting to extinguish their children:

“of the working class, especially wage workers, should not have more than two children at most. The average working man can support no more and and the average working woman can take care of no more in decent fashion.”

Here, Margaret Sanger speaks on her eugenic philosophy – that only the types of “quality” people she and her peers viewed as worthy of life should be allowed to live.”The Wickedness of Creating Large Families.”

Sanger argues that, “because the conditions of large families tend to involve poverty and illness, it is better for everyone involved if a child’s life is snuffed out before he or she has a chance to pose difficulties to its family.

Margaret Sanger was never about women’s rights or freedom to choose, she did what all liberals do and she disguised her hatred in a humanitarian cause. It was about genocide of the “Negro” race, as she called them, and class warfare on the rest of America. Have you ever wondered why they place all the Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in low income urban areas? They continue her population control one baby at a time.


Liberal vs Conservative

Right now in this country there is so much confusion and frustration with the two radically different mindsets. Being raised in small town USA, I have to be honest when I was in middle school the idea that everyone would work and share in the spoils sounded Utopian. When I got in high school and realized there is nothing free in this world I began to change my views more towards “you get what your willing to work for”. To be honest I can not for the life of me understand where these people with liberal ideals came from. At some point you move out on your own, get a job and pay a lot of taxes. Life becomes real. The only thing I can gather is that liberals have never had to fight and scratch for everything they have only to be told they got lucky. So here are a few ideas as seen from both mindsets, lets see where you fall.

Free Speech:

Liberals believe in the idea of free speech to get their points across. They believe that all forward thinking should be allowed as long as they determined that it will promote what they deem as useful to the society. If they don’t like what you have to say they will label it hate speech to diminish, not only the thought, but the speaker.

Conservatives believe in free speech period. If you don’t like what someone is saying you can either debate them or ignore them, but a conservative will always defend a persons right to speak their mind. They learned the old adage long ago that “sticks and stones will break your bones, but words will NEVER hurt you.”

Raising Children:

Liberals raise their children to believe that they are equal to their parents from the time they can speak. They try and reason with a children that do not have the ability to think in rational patterns. This time-out culture frustrates the child because their are no clear boundaries that are set. Life is a ongoing set of decision based on emotion and no clear set of right and wrong.

Conservatives believe in a more biblical based set of rules that are unwavering. A child learns right and wrong through corrective discipline and a steady approach to time tested beliefs. These children learn that how they feel about a situation does not change whether the situation is right or wrong. Having rigid boundaries allows a child actually more freedom when they know how far they can go. As a study conducted with a fenced area and an non fenced area concluded that with a given limitation, children felt safer to explore.


Liberals see school as way to mold a child. It is a place where the wrongs of society, as they have come to see them, are exposed and to indoctrinate the children into the myths of the liberal agenda. Even though they have taught their children to question everything, when they are sent to school there are certain areas that are above reproach. “Global Warming” or “Climate Change” as it’s now called and “Creation.” These two fundamentals as they see them are never to be questioned.

Conservatives see school as a place where your child goes to learn the three R’s. Major issues that effect our society are discussed at home where all sides of a debate can be heard and evaluated. Academia is their to enhance a child’s life, not to raise the child. A child’s values are learned at home, from a very early age, and his interaction in a school setting should only enhance these values.


Liberals see sports as a communal gathering where everyone participates at their own level and whether you really try or not should have no bearing on individual achievement. The idea of a team creates an “us against them” attitude and is detrimental to the overall feeling of companionship. Competition is the root of frustration and only serves to bully a weaker less talented player.

Conservatives see sports as a microcosm of our society. There are always going to be winners and losers and through teamwork they can all help each other to be excel. The idea that everyone gets a trophy only teaches children that your passion and effort don’t really matter in life because you should all end up at the finish line together. It teaches a child that it is just as important to learn to be a gracious winner as a good loser. Sports teaches a child that your level of success is directly related  to the amount of time and effort your willing to put in.

Affirmative Action:

Liberals see affirmative action as a way to pay back minorities for slavery. They see government as being the only way that certain groups in our society will ever ascend the ladder of success. Minorities can never achieve their full potential without being given a hand out, and with a liberals help minorities will someday become equal to whites in our society.

Conservatives see affirmative action as driving a wedge between the races. They believe that minorities are fully capable of becoming whatever they set their minds on. There was a time for affirmative action to level the playing field and that has been accomplished. Getting a job or being accepted into a college should be based solely on skills and effort, and to allow any other criteria only seeks to diminish the individuals accomplishments. Affirmative action ingrains in a persons mind that they will never measure up.


Liberals see government as an extension of the family unit. It is their to supply all the needs of the individual from free lunches at school to free housing for individuals for life. It is the the third parent, or second in some cases, that will be there to fulfill all your wants and needs. It should pick what parts of society are good and what parts should be eliminated. It should monitor all of its citizens in order to best control them. Government is more able to provide for your needs then you are and it is the one thing you can count on when all else fails.

Conservatives see government as the institution that is there to make sure my liberties don’t infringe on your liberties. It is there to take care of commonly used areas such as parks, roads and waterways. Governments main job is to protect its citizens from threats both at home and abroad. They see all other aspects as being over reach into our individual freedoms.

Again I do not see how any individual with a job, a place of their own and a vision of what they want their future to look like thinks with this liberal mindset. Liberals believe that they know what is best for your family, more then you do, and they use the government to force you to capitulate. Conservative, free thinking, entrepreneurial individuals freed this country from the oppression of the king. Why then would anyone want a system where others get to decide what and how much you deserve?

Here comes “Crazy uncle Joe”

“Crazy Uncle Joe”, I first heard that term for Vice president Joe Biden while listening to the Sean Hannity radio program. Joe is the likable old establishment guy who was selected as the face of the other half of the Democratic party in the 2008 election. Then Senator Obama was a young black progressive full of hope and change, and Joe represented the old guard with stability and the more moderate values. On October 21st, 2015 Joe announced he would not be seeking a run for the white house in the Rose garden with President Obama looking on. At the time of this announcement he was polling at 17% amongst Democratic supporters but with over 50% wanting him to join the race. After announcing he would not run he then proceeded to give a fifteen minute campaign speech.

There is no secret about the contentious relationship between Hillary Clinton and President Obama. While running against Obama for president in 2008 Hillary accused Barack of being part of the right wing conspiracy sent to derail her campaign. She accused him of being underhanded and untruthful. All one has to do is look at the debate on Jan. 21st., 2008 to see how much these two dislike each other. Once Obama won the Presidency he didn’t just forget everything that Bill and Hillary said and did to him during the campaign, he filed it away to use at another date. I believe to stop the “Clinton Machine” from doing any more damage to Obama in the campaign, she was offered the Secretary of State position if he was the eventual winner. Once in the position as Secretary, she defied the White House on several occasions. First with her private server that the White House told her in an email not to use. Second with her refusal to sign a separation agreement, which she didn’t sign because that separation agreement requires you to then turn over all your emails to the State Department. The White House has tried to stop Hillary from becoming President with six investigations launched by longtime presidential adviser Valerie Jarrett involving Clinton’s years as Secretary of State.

The FBI has finished its investigation into Hillary’s email scandal and Director James Comey will make his recommendation to the Justice Department soon. If Hillary gets indicted on the numerous felony charges she will be disqualified from being President of the United States. Hillary’s only other real competitor is a self avowed Socialist. So here comes Crazy Uncle Joe to the rescue. Joe Biden is a human gaffe machine and the Democrats try to keep him from speaking in public as much as they can. Like telling Missouri state senator Chuck Graham to stand up at a campaign rally, before realizing that Graham is confined to a wheelchair. While describing Barack Obama he said, “I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that’s a storybook, man.” Who could forget when he said, “In Delaware, the largest growth of population is Indian Americans, moving from India. You cannot go to a 7-11 or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking.” By saying that Joe is not running it has kept the spotlight off of him and he has collected no damage from other presidential hopefuls. When Hillary goes down, he won’t have to run against his longtime friend and will be begged by the DNC, to come into the race to save the party. President Obama has has called on him to be “the man who leads the charge to cure cancer,” in his State of the Union address. If he can lead the charge to cure cancer, then being president should be easy – right? When Biden accepts the challenge, and I believe he will, who would be his running mate? I believe it will be none other the Barack Obama himself. A sitting President has never run for Vice-President but they will say that tough times will call for tough measures. Some will say that, the 12th amendment states that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”  Now, that seems pretty clear – correct?  If you’re not eligible to be President, you can’t be Vice-President. Considering that Obama has already served two full terms he should be ineligible to run. However, one could also argue that the wording of the 22nd amendment only prohibits a two term president from being re-elected, not from actually holding the office.  If he meets all the eligibility requirements, he should still be able to become Vice-President, and then assume office upon the removal of his successor. We all know that “Crazy Uncle Joe” as President is just a third term of Barack Obama.


Hate Speech=Censorship

So how does the “Free Speech Box” work? It goes like this – when I have a thought that I’d like to express I step in the box. If you don’t like what I say and want to respond, do you now step in and I step out? The whole idea that somehow I should’t be allowed to speak because you may not like what I think is ridiculous. I guess today’s liberals were never told as children that “sticks and stones will break your bones, but words can never hurt you.” When did we as a society decide that anyone with a contrary thought is your enemy?  I wonder what debate clubs look like now that nobody can disagree. Do they pick a topic and then all sides see who can agree the most with the preordained, non-confrontational belief. Then they all get a trophy and go home?

In the sixties on college campuses they used to turn on, turn up and tune out. “You tuned out,” that was the way a college student handled not hearing a thought that they disagreed with. When you have been coddled since birth, told everything you say and do is amazing, and that everyone is a winner regardless of talent or effort, it is impossible to know how to react when you get into the real world and you’re not the central focus of all around you. In true Orwellian fashion the college campuses of today have adopted the “hate speak” ideals. The only difference between the sixties and present day is instead of tuning out an idea by walling themselves off, they shut down any contrary thought by labeling it hate speech and walling the speaker in. Does anyone know the time when liberals went from rebelling against the man to being the very thing they profess to hate the most. College campuses were the very place where all different thoughts and ways of life were expressed. Young people from around the world would be thrust into a small college society where different backgrounds and cultures would shape an individual like a potter molds clay. Today’s slogan for our universities should be “send us your coddled masses.” On one campus there was construction taking place and a truck that belonged to one of the workers was parked off campus, but could be seen from the front of a building. In the back window was a rebel flag so the Dean of students had the truck removed so that nobody would have to see it and be offended. She later held a meeting with all students to apologize. These are our next so called leaders and the sight of a rebel flags sends them into a downward spiral. They are the first to profess their superiority in thought and tell you what should and shouldn’t say, but can not even control their own emotions if they see something that they disagree with. Don’t misunderstand, I myself find the rebel flag offensive,but I will defend a person’s right to display it. At what point in this country did we turn over our free speech to the politically correct police, where they get to decide what you can say and to whom you can say it. Who will protect these students’ fragile minds if they were to leave campus and God forbid they run into that truck at a gas station.

Have you noticed that the people preaching tolerance are the most intolerant?  If you believe in gay marriage you are considered compassionate but if you believe that marriage is between a man and a women you are shouted down. As Americans, these differences of opinion and our freedom to debate it is what made us great. Does anyone remember when Germany shut down its free press and picked a common enemy for everyone to think the same way about? By not hearing all sides of an issue, where everyone is free to say what they feel, you will never truly evolve your thinking. Unfortunately for our country right now if you disagree with the collective conscious you are portrayed as a person infringing on others rights. For them there is one chosen way to think, to express yourself and to be an “individual”. They will tell you when they agree enough with your thoughts for it to be your turn to speak.

Strong Border/ Strong Country

The leaders of our country for years have used closing our borders as a political football to somehow gain leverage on an opponent. The Democrats have been for keeping our border open because to close it would be racist towards illegals who cross into our country instead of going through legal channels. They are also looking to the future and see these illegals as additions to their base so they will have an unstoppable majority in the future. The Republicans have said over and over that they want to close the border but every time they are in power they do nothing to achieve this goal. Large corporations are mostly to blame with large campaign donations being made on both sides of the isle with representatives now being beholden to them. With a whole group of people ready and willing to work, as slave labor, in low paying jobs with no benefits, corporations make a lot more money then they would if they had to hire an american worker.

The Progressives will tell you how horrible it is to close our border because the people crossing it are just doing it out of love. They are coming to our country to make a better life for themselves and their families. What they fail to tell you is there is a long line of people already waiting to come into this country legally. Just one time I would like to be with one of these open border supporters, at a Starbucks or an amusement park, and just before it’s their turn a group of people walk in and they get to go first. Do you think they would be as understanding when they kept getting pushed back like the legal immigrants are? The President has been putting forth the narrative that we should not be afraid of immigrants because they are mainly women and children, but the people crossing our southern border are anything but harmless. According to the analysis conducted by the Texas Department of Public Safety, foreign aliens committed 611,234 unique crimes in Texas from 2008 to 2014, including thousands of homicides and sexual assaults. Why do the progressives only care about these so called “families” crossing the border and not the families that are being terrorized in this country.

The Progressives also claim to be the champion for Americas minorities with their war on poverty and pushing for a federal $15/hr minimum wage. The illegals crossing our borders are not doctors, lawyers, journalists and NASA Engineers, they are low skilled or no skill workers. By supporting open borders they are hurting the very people they profess to be helping. Illegals will work for much less then an American worker because they don’t pay taxes, they live many families in a residence, and rely on government assistance for food, shelter and health care. If the border was secured and the illegals were sent back to their native countries there would be a lot of openings for the jobs they are doing. The idea being pushed is that we need illegal workers to do the jobs that Americans won’t do, but if you head to any part of this country where there is not a large population of illegals you will see that every facet of our economy is still going. It is the simple rule of supply and demand. With less people trying for the same jobs, and in some case shortages of workers, the starting wage to attract these employees will naturally go up. With illegals doing the jobs that high school and college age students would do, it robs these young people of getting the skills they would acquire in a work environment.

The next time you hear an open borders supporter spewing the rhetoric that “we were all immigrants at some point” so to not support these poor families makes you a racist, ask yourself these questions. I wonder if they live in a house with walls. I wonder if they lock their doors at night to feel more secure. I wonder if they may even live in a gated community. If they do all of these things to keep people they do not know from getting into their personal space, then why do they, as “Patriotic Americans,” not care that our country has a border and our people need to be protected from unknown intruders as well. A country without a secure border ceases to be a sovereign nation when it can not protect its citizens from external forces.

They can’t be that clueless

I just finished viewing the Democratic debate and can’t for the life of me understand how people think along these lines. Watching the candidates it is tough to figure out which one is more of the socialist. You have Martin O’Malley, who has never cracked 5% nationally and is by far the most likable of the candidates. We really don’t know where he stands on any of the issues because he gets about ten minutes of time to speak in the two hour debates. Next is Bernie Sanders, an avowed socialist. When he rants in his loud and flamboyant way, I find  it hard to think of anything but Doc. Brown, the professor in “Back To The Future.” Then there is Hillary Clinton, who has spent her entire life bashing the “one percent”, a group that she has always been a part of.

As the night went on, and each of the candidates tried to be the one who gave away the most free stuff, I kept wondering when anyone would ask how they planned to pay for it. Finally, when pushed, Bernie said he would pay for his health care plan by raising taxes on the rich, along  with the middle class.  Hillary refused to answer where the money for her plans would come from. As Bernie pushed for socialized medicine with his expansion of Medicare, he put out a statistic that nobody questioned him on. The main reason for the liberals to push for Obama Care was that there were 30 million people in this country that were uninsured. Bernie said last night that his plan would close the gap on the 29 million people who still do not have coverage. So after raising all of our rates, causing companies to go to part-time employees, taxing those who couldn’t afford the new higher rates and a lot of people just losing their health plan and doctors altogether, the net gain of insured people is 1 million. For democrats, taking control of a private industry and making it more expensive and way less efficient is seen as a win, and they now boast that they will expand on the failed system and make it even worse for the American people.

Trying to make sense of all of the rhetoric will make your head hurt. When Hillary Clinton was asked why she thought millennials were supporting Bernie more than two to one, her response was they were supporting him because his health care plan covered them on their parents plan until they are 26. She said that this was important to them because most of them had graduated from college and can’t find a job. Soon after she praised Obama for the great economy we now have. Then she went out of her way to point out her plan to make college free for everyone. In what world would you be able to say that  even though there are no jobs and college students are all looking for work,   we are going to make tax payers foot the bill for even more people to become the educated unemployed. Is this a better economy?

Imagine for a moment that you own a business that the CEO has run into the ground. You would fire the CEO and hire a new one. You would give the new CEO time to put his systems in place before you expected to see results. We are seven years into our new CEO running this country and we have almost 100 million people of work. Although he doubled our debt, we have 50 million people in poverty, 46 million people on food stamps and the real unemployment rate is over 15%. When most people with common sense would distance themselves, Hillary says she is going to take over where he left off. Bernie says he will go even further off the cliff as though when something isn’t working its best to double down on it. I guess I will never understand the liberal mindset that when you work hard to achieve your goals, not only should you feel bad about your accomplishments, but guilty about having more then someone who didn’t try at all.


Don’t All Black Lives Matter?

Don’t All Black Lives Matter?

    In order to believe that there really is a huge problem with police brutality towards African Americans, as being pushed by the Black Lives Matter organization,  you have to take one major thing being said as truth. Probably the most detrimental to race relations is the narrative that most cops are racists. In order for this to be true, in today’s society where everyone has a cell phone, you would hear and see an abuses of power by the police numerous times a day. The Bureau of Justice Statistics said there were 1,557,600 African Americans pulled over in 2008 alone. This number is less than one tenth of one percent higher then whites being stopped in the same year. With these kinds of numbers of interactions between police officers and our black citizens, with only a handful of incidents in question, it lends itself to the fact that there is no where near the problem that the “Race Baiters” would lead you to believe. In the past four years there have been incidents pushed to the fore front in order to push the “racist cops” narrative, only to find out later that what was being said wasn’t actually true. Do we all remember that white guy who shot Trayvon Martin? Every news show ran it as a lead for almost an entire day, some reports even ran the story with the picture of George Zimmerman, who was clearly not white, next to the headline. Hispanic man shoots a black teen just didn’t have the same punch. The facts of the case never really mattered to the press, or the crowds who gathered to protest. Then there was the Michael Brown case in Ferguson. Here was a black teen who was stopped by a police officer while walking in the middle of the road. After unsuccessfully fighting the officer for his gun, he decided to flee. When the officer told him to stop he turned and rushed the officer. As Michael Brown lunged to tackle the officer he was fatally shot by the officer, in self-defense.  The Grand Jury looked at all of the evidence and found no guilt on the part of the officer, but the race machine was already in full gear. There was one black teen, who moments earlier robbed a store with Michael Brown, who said Michael Brown was kneeling down with his hands over his head when he was shot. Even though there were numerous black eyewitnesses who disagreed that he was ever kneeling down and that Michael was actually rushing the officer when he was shot their words didn’t fit with the  “Hands Up Don’t Shoot”. Once “Hands Up Don’t Shoot” was born it didn’t matter how many eyewitnesses refuted it.  What we have learned from Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Eric Garner is that facts don’t matter when you are pushing out a narrative. The “Prejudice Profiteers” come running and establish a false set of events and everyone repeats them as though they are facts, to incite the crowd. Then to devalue any facts that are contrary to these twisted events, they label any dissenting opinion as racism and anyone willing to stand up as a racist. During the Michael Brown riots Jessie Jackson, who has made a living driving a wedge into race relations, was asked by Judge Jeanine Pirro of Fox News during a news broadcast why there were no protests going on in Chicago where 43 black teens were killed the previous weekend. His answer to the question floored me and caused the anchor to pause. Jessie Jackson’s answer was that “blacks kill blacks, it’s part of our culture”. I don’t know about you but having a so called black leader fly to a city to make a race issue out of a proven justified shooting while thinking there is no real tragedy when 43 black teens lost their lives in the same weekend sickens me.
Race relations in this country have been steadily getting better for decades. Only in the United States, where we have elected our first Black President, not once but twice, would people be told race relations were at an all-time low. When our President has had the opportunity to unite this country by showing that everyone can rise to the highest office in this great land, and to help heal some of the old wounds he has decided to do the exact opposite. Without any facts the President has said “The Cambridge police acted stupidly”, “If I had a son he would look like Trayvon”, and in the case of Michael Brown he said “too many innocent black teens are losing their lives at the hands of police officers”. The problem with all of these cases, that were used to push the, ”Racist Cop” narrative, is the facts were overshadowed by the rhetoric. Since taking office and implementing his Liberal Agenda, black Americans are far worse off thus leaving him with a need to change their focus. There was a period of time when he was sworn into office that he also had the House and the Senate with a liberal majority. If he really had the plight of “Black America” weighing so heavily on his mind he could have proposed legislation to help police and intercity relations, but did nothing. In order to hide the fact that liberalism has failed Black America he has launched a full frontal assault on race relations.
In this country they would like you to believe that it is now somehow considered racist to think all lives matter. So to the question I asked at the beginning of this article, “Don’t All Black Lives Matter”? Why does Black America fall for the rhetoric coming from these Prejudice Profiteer’s that pick and choose which black lives matter and which killings are part of the so called “Black Culture”. Does anyone believe that Jessie Jackson or Al Sharpton really care about black youths that are killing each other at unprecedented levels? Why is it that we don’t see them in the streets protesting the hundreds of murders every weekend. If they really cared about Black America they would be fighting for change and giving young people hope. What they peddle is hatred and despair, it is no wonder that the youth don’t value life. When a black American dies at the hands of a police officer, whether it be justified or not, it is a horrible tragedy. It’s not to say that there are not some bad police officers who need to be held accountable, but there are bad elements in every part of our society. If the average citizen is presumed innocent until proven guilty then the same rules should apply to police officers being investigated for misconduct. Black Lives matter would like you to believe that these incidents are the norm and not as rare as they truly are. It is our job as Americans to pull together and not let our society be hijacked by people who are only looking to divide us and set us back twenty years in race relations, so they can remain relevant.