We all have been hearing about the millionaires and billionaires that have taken the average person in this country for a ride. If you build a business and work sixteen hours a day, seven days a week, until your finally successful you somehow took that from someone else. Our own illustrious leader said “if you have a business you didn’t build that”. Our culture is so backwards now that hard work is seen as a slam against someone who doesn’t see a need to work. I have spent a lot of time, this election cycle, on line trying to see what makes liberals think like they do and for the life of me I can not.

I spent the better part of an hour in a heated discussion where I was called a racist because I didn’t want poor people to take my tax money. I was called a moron because if I didn’t believe in socialism I couldn’t use our roads or call the police. Another so called progressive said that if it wasn’t for socialism I would never get Social Security. I have all but given up with trying to reason with these so called “do gooders”, they really should be called “do nothings”. At what point in this country did we go from, “do your best, work hard, give 110% and you will succeed” to “just show up, do what everyone else does, blend into mediocrity and we all get the same”. I’m curious as to who sets up the rules for who can be rich and who needs to pay their fair share.

Will and Jada Pinkett Smith net worth $240 million, why is it nobody thinks they somehow did some shady deal or cheated on their taxes so they didn’t have to pay their fair share?   Bruce Springsteen has an estimated net worth of $300 million, in 2014, but claims to be an organic farmer so he can pay $4,600 on his 200 acres. Do you hear anything about him cheating the poor? In the news today George Clooney is raising money for Hillary Clinton’s campaign. George Clooney’s net worth is estimated at $180 million according to Celebrity Net Worth. Do you think Hillary or anyone else will point out that he is part of the evil 1% that is raping this country? Why is it that a person who makes millions of dollars running a company that employ’s thousands of people is seen as evil, but a celebrity that keeps all their money for themselves is seen as a pillar of virtue? I don’t know whether the ideals of this country have actually changed, or that the media is only covering the people with a hate filled agenda.

Close Our Borders

There has been a lot of talk going back decades about closing our borders and becoming a sovereign nation again. Never has it been more in your face then during this election cycle. Trump has pushed the issue to a level that the main stream media can no longer bury it. These illegal alien’s have been a problem for the American people everyday for decades, not just for ten months of every four year election cycle. They talk about the eleven million illegal’s that are here already, can someone tell me how they are counting them if indeed they are here illegally? That real number is closer to thirty million and some have said it could be as high as fifty million. If they told you that almost seven percent of our population was here illegally, using our countries system, taking away jobs and not paying any taxes in return you may stand up in revolt then.

Ted Cruz in a debate, when asked about this problem, said that if politicians, lawyers or reporters were streaming over the border then there would be a lot more attention given to the problem. The problem of illegal’s gets a lot of play for politicians when running for office but only American citizens actually care that something gets done. The liberal’s see them as the next wave of the Democratic base. Marco Rubio has talked about legalizing these people but not citizenship when he joined Chuck Schoomer and the “Gang of Eight” to draft this legislation. How long do you think, once they are legalized, before the Progressives say that it is basically back to “voting rights act” only in Mexican form. “Taxation without representation” isn’t that why we had the revolution in the first place. The Republican party and its large business donors see illegal’s as cheap labor, workers that do not need to be insured. Through lobbyists and donations they allow the narrative of closing the borders during elections because they know nothing will ever really be done.

Donald Trump says,”I will build a wall, a big beautiful wall and Mexico will pay for it”. With the amount of aid we send to Mexico we could just keep a few billion and get it built. If we’re ever going to get it done “We the People” are going to have to do it. I am making a proposal to every worker who has been affected by illegal alien’s driving down our wages; every worker who lost work because of the inability to compete with this “slave labor”; and every family who can no longer afford health insurance while the government spends over seven hundred and fifty million dollars on health coverage for illegals. My proposal is to pledge labor or donation’s to building this wall. Please comment if you would be willing to work on securing our sovereignty and rebuilding our middle class.

Progressive Socialism

“From every man according to his ability” and to give “each man according to his needs.”

Socialism is inherent in every democratic society and it has proven to be the purist way to strip a person of their drive to succeed. The common thread is a few intellectuals will always think that they can organize a government in such a way that everyone will benefit. These bureaucrats believe they are more capable of deciding what your needs are then you are. This puts them in control of the society. Although every society that has ever adapted socialism has failed the Progressive’s rigid ideology does not allow them to see that the very people they profess to be helping, will suffer the most.

Socialism, which is the end game for the Progressive movement, is predicated on the two party system. In order for it to work the government is set up as the moderator in every aspect of a societies day to day workings. The government takes over industry because the evil rich owners were not being fair to the workers. The owners were making more money then someone not willing or capable of taking the risk of ownership. The government also takes over the banks because the big banks need to be regulated to make their practices fair. Once the government controls all the money and the industry they begin to pick winners and losers. The losers become very poor while the winners become very wealthy.

This system where the government is put in a position to take care of all of a persons needs erodes the society. Progressives will tell you that making everyone have equal results regardless of their effort is the only fair way. This mindset only encourages people who normally try hard to begin to slack off. If you went to work everyday and gave your all for eight hours and got paid the same as someone else who didn’t try very hard or not at all then why would you continue to try. Socialism does not lift the average person it seeks to pull everyone down to the lowest level.

Right now in our society with the progressive agenda in schools the millennials are being taught that regardless of their effort they should get an equal share to a person who has worked for years. They should be able to go to college for free. They should get free health care. What they are not being taught is nothing in life is free. Take the free college for example, in a capitalist society you pay for your own college which makes you work harder in high school to get accepted into college. Once you get in you try hard because when you graduate you want to get a good job to pay those loans back. Once you pay off your loans what you are making becomes your own. In a socialistic society everyone goes to college for free so they take it for granted, some will do well but most won’t care. The difference is that when you graduate, if you do, you will pay for your free college and free health care for the entire time you work by paying sixty to seventy percent of your check in taxes.

Socialism has enslaved the populous in every society that has accepted it. The idea of everyone being equal at the finish line sounds Utopian, but the reality of everyone being equal at the starting line is what releases a societies true potential. How do you make a man try to add to the general fund of wealth if he doesn’t have too? The only true way is making rewards dependent upon doing.

Margaret Sanger/Planned Parenthood

Liberals who support abortion and a so called “a women’s right to choose” have revered Margaret Sanger like she was Mother Theresa. As with most liberal policies there is always an underlying meaning to what they are attempting to ram down the peoples throats. This women would have made a Chinese Hitler feel like he was to soft on his victims.

These are all statements by the late racist, abortion supporting populationist.

Does this sound racist at all?

“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying… demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism…”

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

“Such parents swell the pathetic ranks of the unemployed. Feeble-mindedness perpetuates itself from the ranks of those who are blandly indifferent to their racial responsibilities. And it is largely this type of humanity we are now drawing upon to populate our world for the generations to come. In this orgy of multiplying and replenishing the earth, this type is pari passu multiplying and perpetuating those direst evils in which we must, if civilization is to survive, extirpate by the very roots.”

“Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.”

How about these Chinese modeled population control efforts?

“We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”

“No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…”

“No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.”

Listen to her feelings about the poor and wanting to extinguish their children:

“of the working class, especially wage workers, should not have more than two children at most. The average working man can support no more and and the average working woman can take care of no more in decent fashion.”

Here, Margaret Sanger speaks on her eugenic philosophy – that only the types of “quality” people she and her peers viewed as worthy of life should be allowed to live.”The Wickedness of Creating Large Families.”

Sanger argues that, “because the conditions of large families tend to involve poverty and illness, it is better for everyone involved if a child’s life is snuffed out before he or she has a chance to pose difficulties to its family.

Margaret Sanger was never about women’s rights or freedom to choose, she did what all liberals do and she disguised her hatred in a humanitarian cause. It was about genocide of the “Negro” race, as she called them, and class warfare on the rest of America. Have you ever wondered why they place all the Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in low income urban areas? They continue her population control one baby at a time.


Liberal vs Conservative

Right now in this country there is so much confusion and frustration with the two radically different mindsets. Being raised in small town USA, I have to be honest when I was in middle school the idea that everyone would work and share in the spoils sounded Utopian. When I got in high school and realized there is nothing free in this world I began to change my views more towards “you get what your willing to work for”. To be honest I can not for the life of me understand where these people with liberal ideals came from. At some point you move out on your own, get a job and pay a lot of taxes. Life becomes real. The only thing I can gather is that liberals have never had to fight and scratch for everything they have only to be told they got lucky. So here are a few ideas as seen from both mindsets, lets see where you fall.

Free Speech:

Liberals believe in the idea of free speech to get their points across. They believe that all forward thinking should be allowed as long as they determined that it will promote what they deem as useful to the society. If they don’t like what you have to say they will label it hate speech to diminish, not only the thought, but the speaker.

Conservatives believe in free speech period. If you don’t like what someone is saying you can either debate them or ignore them, but a conservative will always defend a persons right to speak their mind. They learned the old adage long ago that “sticks and stones will break your bones, but words will NEVER hurt you.”

Raising Children:

Liberals raise their children to believe that they are equal to their parents from the time they can speak. They try and reason with a children that do not have the ability to think in rational patterns. This time-out culture frustrates the child because their are no clear boundaries that are set. Life is a ongoing set of decision based on emotion and no clear set of right and wrong.

Conservatives believe in a more biblical based set of rules that are unwavering. A child learns right and wrong through corrective discipline and a steady approach to time tested beliefs. These children learn that how they feel about a situation does not change whether the situation is right or wrong. Having rigid boundaries allows a child actually more freedom when they know how far they can go. As a study conducted with a fenced area and an non fenced area concluded that with a given limitation, children felt safer to explore.


Liberals see school as way to mold a child. It is a place where the wrongs of society, as they have come to see them, are exposed and to indoctrinate the children into the myths of the liberal agenda. Even though they have taught their children to question everything, when they are sent to school there are certain areas that are above reproach. “Global Warming” or “Climate Change” as it’s now called and “Creation.” These two fundamentals as they see them are never to be questioned.

Conservatives see school as a place where your child goes to learn the three R’s. Major issues that effect our society are discussed at home where all sides of a debate can be heard and evaluated. Academia is their to enhance a child’s life, not to raise the child. A child’s values are learned at home, from a very early age, and his interaction in a school setting should only enhance these values.


Liberals see sports as a communal gathering where everyone participates at their own level and whether you really try or not should have no bearing on individual achievement. The idea of a team creates an “us against them” attitude and is detrimental to the overall feeling of companionship. Competition is the root of frustration and only serves to bully a weaker less talented player.

Conservatives see sports as a microcosm of our society. There are always going to be winners and losers and through teamwork they can all help each other to be excel. The idea that everyone gets a trophy only teaches children that your passion and effort don’t really matter in life because you should all end up at the finish line together. It teaches a child that it is just as important to learn to be a gracious winner as a good loser. Sports teaches a child that your level of success is directly related  to the amount of time and effort your willing to put in.

Affirmative Action:

Liberals see affirmative action as a way to pay back minorities for slavery. They see government as being the only way that certain groups in our society will ever ascend the ladder of success. Minorities can never achieve their full potential without being given a hand out, and with a liberals help minorities will someday become equal to whites in our society.

Conservatives see affirmative action as driving a wedge between the races. They believe that minorities are fully capable of becoming whatever they set their minds on. There was a time for affirmative action to level the playing field and that has been accomplished. Getting a job or being accepted into a college should be based solely on skills and effort, and to allow any other criteria only seeks to diminish the individuals accomplishments. Affirmative action ingrains in a persons mind that they will never measure up.


Liberals see government as an extension of the family unit. It is their to supply all the needs of the individual from free lunches at school to free housing for individuals for life. It is the the third parent, or second in some cases, that will be there to fulfill all your wants and needs. It should pick what parts of society are good and what parts should be eliminated. It should monitor all of its citizens in order to best control them. Government is more able to provide for your needs then you are and it is the one thing you can count on when all else fails.

Conservatives see government as the institution that is there to make sure my liberties don’t infringe on your liberties. It is there to take care of commonly used areas such as parks, roads and waterways. Governments main job is to protect its citizens from threats both at home and abroad. They see all other aspects as being over reach into our individual freedoms.

Again I do not see how any individual with a job, a place of their own and a vision of what they want their future to look like thinks with this liberal mindset. Liberals believe that they know what is best for your family, more then you do, and they use the government to force you to capitulate. Conservative, free thinking, entrepreneurial individuals freed this country from the oppression of the king. Why then would anyone want a system where others get to decide what and how much you deserve?

Strong Border/ Strong Country

The leaders of our country for years have used closing our borders as a political football to somehow gain leverage on an opponent. The Democrats have been for keeping our border open because to close it would be racist towards illegals who cross into our country instead of going through legal channels. They are also looking to the future and see these illegals as additions to their base so they will have an unstoppable majority in the future. The Republicans have said over and over that they want to close the border but every time they are in power they do nothing to achieve this goal. Large corporations are mostly to blame with large campaign donations being made on both sides of the isle with representatives now being beholden to them. With a whole group of people ready and willing to work, as slave labor, in low paying jobs with no benefits, corporations make a lot more money then they would if they had to hire an american worker.

The Progressives will tell you how horrible it is to close our border because the people crossing it are just doing it out of love. They are coming to our country to make a better life for themselves and their families. What they fail to tell you is there is a long line of people already waiting to come into this country legally. Just one time I would like to be with one of these open border supporters, at a Starbucks or an amusement park, and just before it’s their turn a group of people walk in and they get to go first. Do you think they would be as understanding when they kept getting pushed back like the legal immigrants are? The President has been putting forth the narrative that we should not be afraid of immigrants because they are mainly women and children, but the people crossing our southern border are anything but harmless. According to the analysis conducted by the Texas Department of Public Safety, foreign aliens committed 611,234 unique crimes in Texas from 2008 to 2014, including thousands of homicides and sexual assaults. Why do the progressives only care about these so called “families” crossing the border and not the families that are being terrorized in this country.

The Progressives also claim to be the champion for Americas minorities with their war on poverty and pushing for a federal $15/hr minimum wage. The illegals crossing our borders are not doctors, lawyers, journalists and NASA Engineers, they are low skilled or no skill workers. By supporting open borders they are hurting the very people they profess to be helping. Illegals will work for much less then an American worker because they don’t pay taxes, they live many families in a residence, and rely on government assistance for food, shelter and health care. If the border was secured and the illegals were sent back to their native countries there would be a lot of openings for the jobs they are doing. The idea being pushed is that we need illegal workers to do the jobs that Americans won’t do, but if you head to any part of this country where there is not a large population of illegals you will see that every facet of our economy is still going. It is the simple rule of supply and demand. With less people trying for the same jobs, and in some case shortages of workers, the starting wage to attract these employees will naturally go up. With illegals doing the jobs that high school and college age students would do, it robs these young people of getting the skills they would acquire in a work environment.

The next time you hear an open borders supporter spewing the rhetoric that “we were all immigrants at some point” so to not support these poor families makes you a racist, ask yourself these questions. I wonder if they live in a house with walls. I wonder if they lock their doors at night to feel more secure. I wonder if they may even live in a gated community. If they do all of these things to keep people they do not know from getting into their personal space, then why do they, as “Patriotic Americans,” not care that our country has a border and our people need to be protected from unknown intruders as well. A country without a secure border ceases to be a sovereign nation when it can not protect its citizens from external forces.

Don’t All Black Lives Matter?

Don’t All Black Lives Matter?

    In order to believe that there really is a huge problem with police brutality towards African Americans, as being pushed by the Black Lives Matter organization,  you have to take one major thing being said as truth. Probably the most detrimental to race relations is the narrative that most cops are racists. In order for this to be true, in today’s society where everyone has a cell phone, you would hear and see an abuses of power by the police numerous times a day. The Bureau of Justice Statistics said there were 1,557,600 African Americans pulled over in 2008 alone. This number is less than one tenth of one percent higher then whites being stopped in the same year. With these kinds of numbers of interactions between police officers and our black citizens, with only a handful of incidents in question, it lends itself to the fact that there is no where near the problem that the “Race Baiters” would lead you to believe. In the past four years there have been incidents pushed to the fore front in order to push the “racist cops” narrative, only to find out later that what was being said wasn’t actually true. Do we all remember that white guy who shot Trayvon Martin? Every news show ran it as a lead for almost an entire day, some reports even ran the story with the picture of George Zimmerman, who was clearly not white, next to the headline. Hispanic man shoots a black teen just didn’t have the same punch. The facts of the case never really mattered to the press, or the crowds who gathered to protest. Then there was the Michael Brown case in Ferguson. Here was a black teen who was stopped by a police officer while walking in the middle of the road. After unsuccessfully fighting the officer for his gun, he decided to flee. When the officer told him to stop he turned and rushed the officer. As Michael Brown lunged to tackle the officer he was fatally shot by the officer, in self-defense.  The Grand Jury looked at all of the evidence and found no guilt on the part of the officer, but the race machine was already in full gear. There was one black teen, who moments earlier robbed a store with Michael Brown, who said Michael Brown was kneeling down with his hands over his head when he was shot. Even though there were numerous black eyewitnesses who disagreed that he was ever kneeling down and that Michael was actually rushing the officer when he was shot their words didn’t fit with the  “Hands Up Don’t Shoot”. Once “Hands Up Don’t Shoot” was born it didn’t matter how many eyewitnesses refuted it.  What we have learned from Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Eric Garner is that facts don’t matter when you are pushing out a narrative. The “Prejudice Profiteers” come running and establish a false set of events and everyone repeats them as though they are facts, to incite the crowd. Then to devalue any facts that are contrary to these twisted events, they label any dissenting opinion as racism and anyone willing to stand up as a racist. During the Michael Brown riots Jessie Jackson, who has made a living driving a wedge into race relations, was asked by Judge Jeanine Pirro of Fox News during a news broadcast why there were no protests going on in Chicago where 43 black teens were killed the previous weekend. His answer to the question floored me and caused the anchor to pause. Jessie Jackson’s answer was that “blacks kill blacks, it’s part of our culture”. I don’t know about you but having a so called black leader fly to a city to make a race issue out of a proven justified shooting while thinking there is no real tragedy when 43 black teens lost their lives in the same weekend sickens me.
Race relations in this country have been steadily getting better for decades. Only in the United States, where we have elected our first Black President, not once but twice, would people be told race relations were at an all-time low. When our President has had the opportunity to unite this country by showing that everyone can rise to the highest office in this great land, and to help heal some of the old wounds he has decided to do the exact opposite. Without any facts the President has said “The Cambridge police acted stupidly”, “If I had a son he would look like Trayvon”, and in the case of Michael Brown he said “too many innocent black teens are losing their lives at the hands of police officers”. The problem with all of these cases, that were used to push the, ”Racist Cop” narrative, is the facts were overshadowed by the rhetoric. Since taking office and implementing his Liberal Agenda, black Americans are far worse off thus leaving him with a need to change their focus. There was a period of time when he was sworn into office that he also had the House and the Senate with a liberal majority. If he really had the plight of “Black America” weighing so heavily on his mind he could have proposed legislation to help police and intercity relations, but did nothing. In order to hide the fact that liberalism has failed Black America he has launched a full frontal assault on race relations.
In this country they would like you to believe that it is now somehow considered racist to think all lives matter. So to the question I asked at the beginning of this article, “Don’t All Black Lives Matter”? Why does Black America fall for the rhetoric coming from these Prejudice Profiteer’s that pick and choose which black lives matter and which killings are part of the so called “Black Culture”. Does anyone believe that Jessie Jackson or Al Sharpton really care about black youths that are killing each other at unprecedented levels? Why is it that we don’t see them in the streets protesting the hundreds of murders every weekend. If they really cared about Black America they would be fighting for change and giving young people hope. What they peddle is hatred and despair, it is no wonder that the youth don’t value life. When a black American dies at the hands of a police officer, whether it be justified or not, it is a horrible tragedy. It’s not to say that there are not some bad police officers who need to be held accountable, but there are bad elements in every part of our society. If the average citizen is presumed innocent until proven guilty then the same rules should apply to police officers being investigated for misconduct. Black Lives matter would like you to believe that these incidents are the norm and not as rare as they truly are. It is our job as Americans to pull together and not let our society be hijacked by people who are only looking to divide us and set us back twenty years in race relations, so they can remain relevant.